Tariff compliance and its significance for the awarding of public contracts
In the field of public procurement, numerous contracting authorities rely on requirements for tariff compliance to ensure fair competition and prevent wage dumping abuses. Federal and state legal provisions aim to ensure that companies competing for public contracts pay their employees either collectively agreed or customary local wages. In this context, the so-called Tariftreuegesetz (Law on Tariff Compliance) plays a central role and aims to ensure compliance with social minimum standards while simultaneously regulating market competition.
The scope, design, and implementation of corresponding tariff compliance obligations have recently been increasingly the subject of political and legal discussions as well as legislative initiatives at both federal and state level.
Fundamentals and objectives of Tariftreuegesetze
Tariftreuegesetze obligate companies within the meaning of procurement law to observe certain minimum tariff conditions in the execution of public contracts. The respective requirements depend on the federal state, as state-specific regulations or directives frequently apply in addition to federal law.
Historical context and development
The legislative development of tariff compliance is closely linked to the intention of preventing ruinous underbidding competition in the public sector. Previous wage standards for public contracts have been replaced over the years by more differentiated systems, which include not only wage levels but also working conditions and social standards. Currently, legislators are working toward further harmonization of these standards at the federal level. One aim is to better anchor tariff compliance requirements as mandatory prerequisites for the awarding of public contracts.
Scope of application and exceptions
In principle, tariff compliance obligations apply to all companies participating in procurement processes in the public sector, whether at the federal, state, or municipal level. In particular, the regulations are applied in the construction industry, the cleaning sector, public transport, and social services. Exceptions can exist, for example, for smaller contract values, certain types of services, or intermunicipal cooperation.
Impacts on competition and market participants
The practical implementation of tariff compliance obligations is not without challenges. On the one hand, employees of companies engaged by the public sector benefit from a minimum level of financial security and employment protection. On the other hand, the access to the public contract market is significantly restricted for companies that do not wish or are unable to comply with collective bargaining agreements.
Consequences for procurement practice
The introduction and enforcement of tariff compliance requirements lead in practice to significant verification and documentation obligations for awarding authorities and companies. Public contracting authorities are obliged to regularly verify compliance with tariff requirements, often based on self-declarations by bidders, submission of evidence, or, in individual cases, by external audits. Violations can result not only in exclusion from the procurement process but—if persistently disregarded—in substantial sanctions and claims for recovery.
Challenges and legal issues in implementation
The case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the Federal Constitutional Court particularly highlights the European legal framework and the question of the compatibility of tariff compliance obligations with the principles of procurement law such as transparency, equal treatment, and the prohibition of discrimination. Generally, courts recognize tariff compliance obligations as permissible means to ensure minimum employment standards but call for a balanced design and careful consideration of the interests involved. Certain issues, such as specific forms of verification, sanctions in case of violations, or the consequences of transnational service provision, have not yet been conclusively clarified and are therefore the subject of ongoing legislative and judicial clarification.
Outlook: Planned reforms and current developments
Political initiatives to tighten or harmonize tariff compliance laws show that the topic continues to have high priority and further legal adjustments are to be expected. This especially concerns the alignment of state-specific requirements, modernization of documentation obligations, and strengthening of control mechanisms.
At the same time, the debate is shaped by current legislative projects at the federal level, for example, the planned Federal Tariff Compliance Act. Here, not only social and labor market policy objectives are pursued, but also requirements of European public procurement law and the internal market are considered.
Significance for companies – leeway for action and risks
Companies wishing to participate in public tenders are increasingly confronted with differentiated and complex requirements regarding wage and employment conditions. Strict and correct compliance with the relevant provisions is crucial for success in procurement proceedings and can significantly minimize liability and competition law risks. In light of the complex legal landscape, it is advisable to monitor ongoing developments closely and to regularly review internal processes to ensure compliance with legal requirements at all times.
The verification and documentation obligations required in the wake of tariff compliance requirements can be managed efficiently, provided those responsible are familiar with applicable rules, current case law, and potential reforms. This is especially true for companies operating nationally or internationally, for which divergent requirements at the state and EU level play a particular role.
—
In light of ongoing developments and the complex legal situation, individual advice from experienced Rechtsanwalt at MTR Legal can offer valuable support in addressing in-depth legal questions on tariff compliance and public procurement.
