Legal Lexicon

Top

Term and general definition of “Top” in the legal context

The term “Top” has various meanings in everyday language, ranging from describing a type of upper garment in the clothing industry to its use as a ranking designation (e.g., “top manager,” “top offer”). Legally, “Top” can play a role in different contexts, especially as a product designation, part of a brand, or in contractual arrangements. The following article provides a systematic and comprehensive overview of the legal aspects of the term “Top.”


Top as a product and brand designation

Trademark protection of “Top”

In trademark law, registering simple, descriptive, or promotional terms is often problematic. “Top” is frequently used as a promotional reference for the quality of a product or service (“top quality,” “top price”). Under Section 8 (2) No. 1 of the German Trademark Act (MarkenG), trademarks are excluded from registration if they merely serve to describe the nature, quality, or other characteristics of goods or services. The term “Top” is therefore often not distinctive, as it is merely understood as a quality feature.

Registrability and protectability

To be registered as a trademark, “Top” must be distinctive in relation to the claimed goods or services and must not be subject to a need to keep the term free (Section 8 (2) No. 2 MarkenG). As a sole term, “Top” is generally not registrable for most industries, as it is used for description or advertising. Combinations like “TopCar” or “TopHandy” can be distinctive under certain circumstances, particularly if their design and graphic elements clearly indicate origin from a specific company.

Competition law aspects

The term “Top” is frequently used in advertising. Under the Act Against Unfair Competition (UWG), advertising claims must not be misleading. Statements like “top quality” must be objectively verifiable in individual cases or be clearly identifiable as subjective opinions. Misleading use of “Top” can, pursuant to Section 5 UWG, constitute an inadmissible commercial practice.


Contract law significance of “Top”

Use in performance descriptions

In contract law, “Top” can form part of service descriptions or agreements regarding the condition of goods. For example, in a purchase agreement, the description “top condition” can constitute an agreement on quality within the meaning of Section 434 of the German Civil Code (BGB). The interpretation of what “Top” specifically means depends on the circumstances of the individual case, taking into account industry standards and the parties’ agreements.

Legal consequences in case of delivery and defects

If a product is offered as “Top,” the buyer may expect it to be in a special condition (e.g., like new, without visible signs of use). If the goods do not correspond to this condition, a defect within the meaning of sales law pursuant to Sections 434 et seq. BGB may exist, entitling the buyer to claims for subsequent performance, reduction, or damages. The exact meaning and scope of the term are regularly determined by the courts based on the circumstances at the conclusion of the contract.


“Top” in intellectual property law

Protection as a company sign

In addition to trademarks, “Top” can also be used as a business identifier or company name (e.g., “Top Reinigung GmbH”). Protection as a company sign is governed by Sections 5, 15 MarkenG and arises as soon as the sign is used in business transactions, provided it is distinctive. Protection is limited to the business area and the reputation acquired.

Protection as a work title

In certain cases, “Top” can be protected as a work title under Section 5 (3) MarkenG, for example for films, magazines, or periodicals with “Top” as part of the title.


Legal situation in copyright, licensing, and e-commerce law

“Top” as a component of license agreements

If “Top” is used as part of a work title, product name, or brand name in license agreements, it is essential to define and secure the term contractually. A clear definition avoids ambiguities about the scope, duration, and territorial reach of the rights transfer.

Online trading and misleading “Top” descriptions

In e-commerce, “Top” regularly appears in product descriptions and advertising materials. Platforms and retailers must ensure that its use does not violate competition or consumer protection laws. If there are no objective criteria for “Top,” this will generally be interpreted to the detriment of the user.


International aspects and particularities

EU-legal dimension

The relevant trademark, competition, and consumer protection law is harmonized at the European level. The EU Trademark Regulation (EUTMR) largely corresponds to the German regulations regarding the refusal of descriptive and non-distinctive marks. The UCP Directive is applied with respect to misleading advertising.

Differences with other legal systems

In other legal systems, e.g., the Anglo-American system, there are also parallels regarding the obstacle to registration for generic terms (“descriptive terms”). In individual cases, the international protectability of “Top” depends on each country’s national legislation and business practices.


Summary and legal assessment

In conclusion, it can be stated that the term “Top” is of considerable importance in legal transactions, especially in trademark, competition, and contract law. “Top” is generally not eligible for protection as a trademark on its own and must not be used abusively or misleadingly. In contractual relationships, its meaning must be determined in light of general trade practice. Internationally, the key principles are in line with the German provisions. Legally secure use of “Top” therefore requires a precise definition, careful assessment of protectability, and compliance with relevant rules on misleading practices.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who owns the copyrights to a top design?

Copyright in a top design generally belongs to the creator, i.e., the designer, provided a personal intellectual creation exists (Section 2 (2) UrhG). However, if the design was created in the context of an employment relationship, the rights can be transferred to the employer in accordance with Section 43 UrhG, if this is stipulated in the employment contract or corresponding agreements. In the case of commissioned work, the legal situation should be specified in the contract, as without an explicit transfer of rights, the copyright remains with the designer. Additionally, other intellectual property rights, such as design rights (Geschmacksmusterrecht), may be relevant. Here, the applicant is usually the rights holder, although employment or commission-specific transfer rules may also apply.

What legal steps can I take against unauthorized reproductions of my top?

If unauthorized reproduction (product piracy) occurs, you as the rights holder can assert claims for injunctive relief and removal in accordance with Section 97 UrhG and may also claim damages. Generally, the first step is to send a warning letter, demanding the infringer cease and desist and, if applicable, provide information. If the infringer fails to comply, you can apply for a preliminary injunction with the competent court or file a lawsuit. In addition to civil claims, criminal consequences under Sections 106 et seq. UrhG may apply. For design rights infringements, similar claims arise under Section 38 DesignG, and seizure or destruction of counterfeit goods may also be sought.

Is it permitted to copy another person’s top design for private use?

Copying a top design that is copyrighted or registered as a design for purely private use may be permissible under certain conditions. According to Section 53 (1) UrhG, making private copies is generally allowed, but this does not apply to templates that are obviously unlawfully produced or made publicly available (Section 53 (1) sentence 2 UrhG). However, a privately copied top must not be sold or shown publicly, as this would exceed the scope of private copying. Under design law, Section 40 DesignG provides an exemption for acts for non-commercial purposes, as long as there is no intent to compete. In case of doubt, legal advice should be sought.

What labelling obligations exist when selling tops in Germany?

When placing tops (textile goods) on the market, various statutory labelling requirements apply. The decisive law is the Textile Labelling Regulation (EU) No. 1007/2011, which stipulates that all textile components must be correctly identified regarding their fibre composition. The labelling must be in German and be permanently and legibly attached. In addition, under the Product Safety Act (ProdSG), the name and contact address of the manufacturer or importer and any necessary safety instructions must be provided, especially if the product entails specific risks. Registered trademarks must also be clearly labelled under trademark law to prevent the risk of confusion. Violations may result in warnings and fines.

What legal aspects must be considered when importing and distributing tops from non-EU countries?

Importers of tops from non-EU countries must ensure that all relevant statutory requirements are met. This includes complete and correct textile labelling and compliance with product safety regulations, particularly under REACH (chemical law) and the ProdSG. Imported goods must comply with EU product standards, including chemical composition and safety aspects (e.g., flammability). Trademark and possible design rights of third parties must also be checked to prevent rights infringements. For customs clearance, proper declaration is necessary, and import duties may apply.

To what extent is a retailer liable for counterfeit branded tops?

Retailers are generally liable for distributing counterfeit branded tops, even if they are not the manufacturer. Under Sections 14, 15 MarkenG, the trademark owner can demand injunctive relief, damages, and destruction of the counterfeit goods. Liability applies to both intentional and negligent behaviour; therefore, retailers are obliged to verify the origin and authenticity of their goods. In cases of negligence, merely placing goods on the market without proper checking is sufficient. In serious cases, criminal prosecution under Section 143 MarkenG may also occur, including fines or imprisonment.