Legal Lexicon

Wiki»Legal Lexikon»Gesellschaftsrecht»Regulation (EU) on Fair Funding

Regulation (EU) on Fair Funding

Definition and significance of the EuGFVO

Die European Enforcement Officer Regulation (abbreviated EuGFVO) is an important regulation of the European Union that, as part of the harmonization of civil procedure law, regulates cross-border enforcement proceedings within the Member States. The aim of the EuGFVO is to facilitate and make more efficient the mutual recognition and enforcement of judicial and extrajudicial decisions in civil and commercial matters across Europe. The EuGFVO thus makes a significant contribution to the creation of a unified European legal area and the improvement of cross-border legal protection.

Legal foundations and scope of application

Origin and development

The EuGFVO was established on the basis of Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and is part of the so-called ‘Brussels I bis’ regulations, which serve to harmonize international civil proceedings. The regulation is directly applicable law in the Member States and does not require further implementation into national law.

Territorial and substantive scope of application

The EuGFVO applies to all Member States of the European Union with the exception of Denmark, which, due to a reservation, does not participate in judicial cooperation in civil matters. It applies to decisions in civil and commercial matters, but does not cover decisions in the areas of tax law, customs law, administrative matters, or certain rights connected to marriage, inheritance, and insolvency.

Contents and regulations of the EuGFVO

Recognition and enforcement of decisions

The EuGFVO sets out detailed procedures for the recognition and enforcement of decisions issued by courts in a Member State. According to the regulation, judicial decisions are generally to be recognized automatically and without separate recognition proceedings in the other Member States.

Abolition of the exequatur procedure

A central element of the EuGFVO is the abolition of the so-called exequatur procedure, which previously served as an intermediate process for the recognition and declaration of enforceability of foreign titles. It is now sufficient for a judgment rendered in a Member State that is final and enforceable to be enforced directly in any other Member State.

Enforcement title and certificate

For cross-border enforcement, the creditor requires, in addition to the actual enforcement title, a certificate in accordance with the requirements of the EuGFVO. The certificate is issued using a standardized form that includes, among other things, details of the decision, the parties, and enforceability.

Jurisdiction and procedure

The EuGFVO also determines the international jurisdiction of the courts for enforcement. The enforcement procedure is generally governed by the law of the enforcing state. The regulation also provides protections for the debtor, such as the possibility to apply for suspension or limitation of enforcement.

Legal consequences and significance within the European legal area

Facilitating cross-border legal protection

The introduction of the EuGFVO has considerably strengthened legal protection within the European single market. Abolition of the exequatur procedure reduces time and costs for creditors, while at the same time ensuring non-discriminatory procedures between Member States.

Relationship with other legal instruments

The EuGFVO is part of a broader context of European legal acts concerning the harmonization of civil law, such as the Brussels Ia Regulation (EU No. 1215/2012), the European Enforcement Order Regulation (EuVT), and the Regulation establishing a European order for payment procedure.

Priority rule

In cases of overlap between different regulations, the EuGFVO provides for specific priority rules. This applies, for instance, in relation to the EuVT, where a choice of options is made available for creditors.

Legal protection and procedure in case of disputes

Legal remedies

The EuGFVO grants the debtor various legal remedies to contest unjustified or erroneous enforcement measures. These include in particular objections to recognition and enforcement on grounds of violation of public policy (ordre public) or defective service of the decision in the state of origin.

Jurisdiction and procedure

Jurisdiction for handling legal remedies lies with the competent court of the enforcing state. The regulation defines strict deadlines and procedural requirements to ensure prompt and fair proceedings.

Practical tips and outlook

It is advisable for the parties to pay particular attention to the relevant provisions of the EuGFVO, especially in cross-border debt matters. The practical importance of the regulation will continue to increase with advancing networking and globalization, so continuous monitoring of legal and practical developments in this area appears prudent.


References:

  • Brussels Ia Regulation (EU No. 1215/2012)
  • European Enforcement Order Regulation (EC No. 805/2004)
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

See also:

  • Brussels IIa Regulation
  • European Payment Order
  • Recognition and enforcement of decisions in the European Union

Frequently asked questions

When and under what conditions is the processing of personal data lawful under the EuGFVO?

Processing of personal data is, according to the European General Data Protection Regulation (EuGFVO), commonly referred to as the GDPR, generally only lawful if at least one of the conditions listed in Art. 6(1) EuGFVO is fulfilled. The most important conditions include, in particular, the consent of the data subject, which must be given voluntarily, informed, and unambiguously. In addition, data processing may be permitted if it is necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subject is a party, or for the implementation of pre-contractual measures. Processing may also be based on a legal obligation of the controller, serve to protect vital interests, be necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest, or take place to safeguard the legitimate interests of the controller or a third party, provided these are not overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject. For special categories of personal data (e.g., health data), particularly strict requirements apply pursuant to Art. 9 EuGFVO.

What information obligations do controllers have according to the EuGFVO?

According to Articles 13 and 14 EuGFVO, controllers are required to inform data subjects comprehensively about the processing activities at the time the data is collected. This includes, among other things, details of the identity and contact details of the controller and, if applicable, the data protection officer, the purposes and legal basis of the processing, data recipients, any transfer to third countries, and the storage period. Information must also be provided about the rights of the data subject, such as the right of access, rectification, erasure, or restriction of processing, as well as the right to object. If the data is not collected directly from the data subject, additional information about the origin of the data must be provided. The information must be precise, transparent, understandable, and easily accessible.

What rights do data subjects have under the EuGFVO?

Under the EuGFVO, data subjects enjoy extensive rights with regard to their personal data. Key rights include the right of access (Art. 15), the right to rectification (Art. 16), erasure (right to be forgotten, Art. 17), restriction of processing (Art. 18), the right to data portability (Art. 20), and the right to object to certain types of processing (Art. 21). In addition, there is the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing—including profiling (Art. 22). Exercising these rights is generally free of charge and must be handled by the controller within specified deadlines. In case of doubt, the data subject may lodge a complaint with the competent supervisory authority.

What obligations do companies have with regard to data security?

Companies and other controllers must take appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk for the personal data processed (Art. 32 EuGFVO). This includes, for example, encryption technologies, access restrictions, regular data backups, and training of employees. The measures are to be determined individually, taking into account the state of the art, implementation costs, the nature, scope and context of processing, as well as the risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. Regular reviews and updates of the existing security measures are also required. In the case of data protection breaches, reporting and, where applicable, notification obligations exist.

Do companies have to appoint a data protection officer?

The obligation to appoint a data protection officer arises from Art. 37 EuGFVO under certain conditions, in particular if the core activity of the company involves large-scale processing of special categories of personal data, regular and systematic monitoring is required, or a legal provision mandates it. The data protection officer is tasked with monitoring internal compliance with data protection regulations, training employees, and acting as a contact for data subjects and supervisory authorities. The contact details of the data protection officer must be published and communicated to the competent supervisory authority.

What requirements apply when transmitting personal data to third countries?

The transfer of personal data to so-called third countries, that is, states outside the European Economic Area (EEA), is only permitted under certain conditions (Art. 44 et seq. EuGFVO). Basically, an adequate level of data protection must be ensured in the recipient country. This can be achieved either through an adequacy decision of the European Commission or through appropriate safeguards such as standard contractual clauses, binding corporate rules, or approved codes of conduct. In exceptional cases, a transfer can also be based on the explicit consent of the data subject or for the performance of contracts. The exact requirements and safeguards must be documented and be demonstrable to the supervisory authority.

What are the consequences of violations of the EuGFVO?

Violations of the EuGFVO can have significant consequences for controllers and processors. These include, in particular, the imposition of fines by data protection supervisory authorities, whereby milder means are to be preferred and penalties must be proportionate. The maximum amount can reach up to EUR 20 million or – for companies – up to 4% of the global annual turnover, whichever is higher (Art. 83). In addition, individual data subjects can assert claims for damages against the controller (Art. 82), and authorities can impose orders such as deletion of data, restriction of processing, or prohibition of processing activities. Violations can also lead to significant reputational damage.