Legal Lexicon

Wiki»Legal Lexikon»Strafrecht»Purpose Association

Purpose Association

Definition and Legal Classification of the Zweckgemeinschaft

Als Zweckgemeinschaft refers in German law to a kind of association of several persons, which is exclusively aimed at achieving a common, usually objective goal, without requiring a comprehensive personal connection or an economic cooperation to be the focus. The Zweckgemeinschaft is a special form of association and is characterized especially by the absence of further-reaching legal ties and the existence of a specifically determined purpose.

Distinction from Other Forms of Associations

In contrast to permanent associations, as typically found in civil law partnerships (Sections 705 et seq. BGB) or corporate bodies (e.g., associations under Section 21 BGB), the Zweckgemeinschaft is often of short duration and exists only as long as required to fulfill its intended purpose. Likewise, the Zweckgemeinschaft differs from interest groups, working groups, or domestic communities, as there is no ongoing personal or economic relationship involved.

Legal Nature of the Zweckgemeinschaft

Requirements and Characteristics

The following features are particularly relevant for the existence of a Zweckgemeinschaft:

  • Association of several natural or legal persons
  • A common supra-individual goal that is the primary focus
  • No or only very limited mutual legal ties
  • Absence of its own legal personality
  • Relationship serves the sole purpose (e.g., to carry out a one-time event or a specific task)

Zweckgemeinschaften are often referred to as “de facto associations” from a legal perspective. Their key feature is the absence of any comprehensive corporate structure, and the relationship between the participants primarily serves the specified occasion or purpose.

Legal Classification and Formation

Zweckgemeinschaften generally arise informally through agreement of will among the participants, usually by express agreement (orally or in writing), but also implicitly through joint and purposeful action. Legally, the association neither has its own legal personality nor qualifies as a partnership under Section 705 BGB, as long as no further binding or profit-making intent exists.

Typical Forms and Areas of Application

Examples of Zweckgemeinschaften

Zweckgemeinschaften can be found in a wide range of social and economic contexts. Typical use cases include:

  • Carpooling for the shared use of a means of transportation with the goal of a joint trip
  • Shopping communities to obtain bulk discounts without additional obligations
  • Study groups organized collectively to prepare for a specific exam date
  • Forming a group for the joint attendance of an event
  • Forming a household community for tasks such as garden maintenance or snow removal

Zweckgemeinschaften in Labor Law

In labor and social security law, Zweckgemeinschaften have particular relevance. According to Section 2 (1) No. 1 SGB VII (Social Code Book Seven – Statutory Accident Insurance), a Zweckgemeinschaft can qualify as a group formed to jointly carry out events or measures, thereby falling under statutory accident insurance protection. This applies, for example, to carpooling in work contexts, which is often recognized by case law as a Zweckgemeinschaft, provided that joint pursuit of a purpose is clearly discernible.

Zweckgemeinschaften in Tenancy Law and Shared Living Arrangements

Zweckgemeinschaften are also commonly relevant in tenancy law. Shared apartments (Wohngemeinschaften), in which people rent a property together but do not plan a long-term communal lifestyle, are legally regarded as Zweckgemeinschaften. Their significance particularly lies in liability questions towards the landlord or third parties, as well as regarding the internal regulation of members’ rights and duties.

Legal Effects and Liability

Binding Effects Between Participants

The obligations within a Zweckgemeinschaft are generally limited to the intended purpose. Due to the absence of a corporate relationship, participants have no far-reaching obligations—unless expressly agreed otherwise. Accordingly, general contract law regulates mutual rights and duties, for example, sharing costs in a carpool.

External Relations and Liability Towards Third Parties

Liability of persons associated in a Zweckgemeinschaft is generally limited to contractual relations with third parties. There is no joint and several liability without an express contractual basis. An internal liability exclusion within the group can arise from mutual agreement; however, individual tort liability remains unaffected (Sections 823 et seq. BGB).

Social Security Law Aspects

A Zweckgemeinschaft can, in individual cases, be an important factor in insurance-related issues. For example, courts assess whether certain accidents in the context of carpools qualify as occupational accidents under statutory accident insurance. It generally depends on whether the joint purpose is clearly defined and is directed towards an employer-related objective.

Dissolution and Termination of the Zweckgemeinschaft

A Zweckgemeinschaft regularly ends upon achievement or loss of its intended purpose. Termination occurs automatically upon completion of the desired activity or if the purpose becomes impossible. Individual agreements for continuation or early dissolution are permissible, and each member may generally declare their withdrawal, provided this does not frustrate the agreed purpose.

Zweckgemeinschaft in Tax Law

In German tax law, Zweckgemeinschaften can be particularly relevant with respect to VAT treatment of services and the allocation of jointly incurred costs. The tax implications depend on whether the Zweckgemeinschaft acts as an entrepreneur within the meaning of Section 2 UStG and whether the members declare their revenue jointly or individually. The allocation of input tax credits may also need to be examined.

Literature and Sources

This overview is based on relevant literature explaining the term in BGB commentaries, various decisions of the Federal Court of Justice and regional courts, as well as publications addressing distinctions between Zweckgemeinschaften in labor and social security law.


Note: Due to their diversity and the regular absence of broad legal ties, Zweckgemeinschaften must always be assessed on a case-by-case basis. Although many principles appear to be generally valid, specific legal provisions (such as in social security or tax law) may establish differing regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What legal prerequisites must be met for the recognition of a Zweckgemeinschaft?

For the legal recognition of a Zweckgemeinschaft, it is generally required that several persons voluntarily and contractually join forces to pursue a common and lawful purpose that is not aimed at generating profit. The purpose must be clearly defined and legally permissible; immoral or illegal objectives render the agreement void (Sections 134, 138 BGB). In addition, some organizational structure must be identifiable, usually in the form of rights and duties of the members and internal rules. A written contract is not strictly necessary, but highly recommended for evidentiary purposes. The agreement of will among the participants to undertake joint activity based on mutual obligations is legally essential. Depending on the purpose and structure, additional requirements may arise from special statutes (e.g., association law, company law).

How does a Zweckgemeinschaft legally differ from a civil law partnership (GbR)?

Although both legal forms require an association of several persons to achieve a common goal, important differences exist. The civil law partnership (GbR) under Sections 705 et seq. BGB is always aimed at commercial business operation or the joint pursuit of a specific, possibly idealistic purpose. In contrast, a Zweckgemeinschaft generally does not seek economic gain but rather an ideal or social objective (such as car pooling, buying groups, or neighborly assistance). Whereas the GbR has comprehensive rules for liability and management, Zweckgemeinschaften are generally less strictly structured and liability distribution is mainly defined by the agreement among members. Further, classic Zweckgemeinschaften, as long as they do not meet the criteria of a GbR, are generally not subject to the legal specifics of corporate law.

What liability rules apply to members of a Zweckgemeinschaft?

Liability within Zweckgemeinschaften primarily depends on the underlying contract and the specific structure. If the members have explicitly agreed on contractual limitations of liability, this internal agreement applies first. In the absence of such a provision, joint and several liability of all members can exist if obligations are entered into with third parties. If the Zweckgemeinschaft is, in fact, a GbR, statutory regulations on liability (Sections 705 et seq. BGB) apply, meaning partners are personally and unlimitedly liable for partnership debts. In cases where the purpose is pursued only internally and there are no legal relations with third parties, only the members are bound by their agreements. Gross negligence or intentional acts by a member may give rise to special liability. Therefore, it is advisable to address liability issues clearly and explicitly in the founding agreement.

Does the formation of a Zweckgemeinschaft require approval or registration?

The formation of a pure Zweckgemeinschaft generally requires no government approval or registration. It is a private agreement. The situation is different if the Zweckgemeinschaft engages in commercial business, for which, for example, a business registration is required or if, through outside organization (such as a constitution, board), the threshold for a registered association or another legal entity is crossed. If income is generated, tax regulations may have to be observed (e.g., registration with the tax office, tax returns). Special provisions, such as operating vehicles or hazardous facilities, may create additional reporting or permit requirements. However, the mere formation itself is legally informal and uncomplicated.

How is a Zweckgemeinschaft legally dissolved?

The dissolution of a Zweckgemeinschaft is primarily governed by the conditions specified in the founding agreement. Usually, termination of purpose, achievement or impossibility of the goal, or withdrawal or death of individual members is agreed as grounds for dissolution. If contractual provisions are lacking, Sections 723 et seq. BGB apply by analogy, meaning each member can generally terminate at any time unless there is untimely termination. Upon dissolution, any joint assets are distributed proportionally (Section 730 BGB analogously). For joint purchases or obligations, a settlement of accounts is required. Remaining obligations to third parties must be fulfilled jointly unless otherwise agreed.

What tax implications does a Zweckgemeinschaft have?

Whether and to what extent a Zweckgemeinschaft is relevant for tax purposes depends on the specific field of activity and organization. Pure Zweckgemeinschaften, whose activities are restricted to the private sphere and do not pursue joint economic gain, are generally not taxable. However, if income is generated (such as joint purchasing followed by resale), tax registration may be required. In such cases, the tax authority may treat the group as a joint enterprise or a GbR and may require tax returns. VAT scenarios are also possible if services are provided for payment. Member contributions towards costs generally do not trigger tax obligations. Consulting a tax advisor is recommended if there are uncertainties.

Can a Zweckgemeinschaft legally enter into contracts?

Yes, if the Zweckgemeinschaft is legally capable or is represented by its members externally, it can enter into contracts. As Zweckgemeinschaften generally do not possess legal personality, either all members must conclude contracts jointly or representation must be assigned internally to act with effect for all. Contractual obligations take effect directly for the individuals involved. If commitments to third parties are undertaken, members are liable according to the agreed terms or jointly and severally if no arrangement exists. For practical reasons, the right of representation should always be stipulated in writing in the founding contract to ensure legal certainty for internal and external matters.