Legal Lexicon

Wiki»Legal Lexikon»Rechtsbegriffe (allgemein)»Exclusion from the Right to Vote

Exclusion from the Right to Vote

Concept and General Significance of Disenfranchisement

The exclusion from voting rights refers to the legal situation in which a person is deprived of their active and/or passive voting rights. This concerns the right to participate in political elections (active voting right) as well as the right to stand as a candidate (passive voting right). The exclusion can be limited in time or permanent. In modern democracies, it is typically narrowly and legally defined, as the right to vote is considered a fundamental basic right.

Legal Basis of Disenfranchisement in Germany

Constitutional Foundations

The right to vote in Germany is enshrined in Article 38 of the Basic Law (GG) for federal elections, as well as in the respective state constitutions for state elections. In principle, it is granted to all German citizens who have reached the minimum age. A disenfranchisement is only permissible under the conditions expressly provided by law (so-called statutory reservation).

Statutory Provisions

The conditions for the exclusion from voting rights are specified in the respective electoral laws:

  • Federal Election Act (BWG)
  • European Election Act (EuWG)
  • State election laws
  • Municipal election laws

These laws set out in detail under which circumstances the right to vote may be excluded.

Categories of Disenfranchisement

Exclusion from Active Voting Rights

According to § 13 BWG, active voting rights can particularly be excluded in the following cases:

  • Lack of legal capacity (§ 13 No. 2 BWG): Persons who have been assigned a custodian for all their affairs (complete guardianship) are excluded from the right to vote. Exceptions and changes due to supreme court rulings and legislative reforms must be taken into account.
  • Exclusion in connection with criminal judgments (§ 13 No. 3 BWG): Persons who, by court decision, have lost their voting rights due to certain criminal offenses (e.g., electoral fraud, high treason) are excluded from active voting rights.
  • Disenfranchisement in the European Context (EuWG): Corresponding provisions for exclusion also apply to participation in European elections.

Exclusion from Passive Voting Rights

Passive voting rights may be withdrawn under the following conditions:

  • Loss due to criminal conviction: According to § 45 of the Criminal Code (StGB), the right to be elected to public office can be withdrawn upon conviction for certain offenses. This withdrawal is generally for a limited period but may be extended or be permanent in individual cases.
  • Other statutory grounds for exclusion: Specific grounds for exclusion may vary according to the respective electoral law (e.g., municipal election law). For example, after certain disciplinary measures, civil servants may be temporarily deprived of passive voting rights.

Grounds for Exclusion in an International Comparison

Comparatively, other countries also have regulations regarding disenfranchisement, often with reference to managing voting rights in cases of criminal or civil impairments (e.g., incarceration, incapacitation, specific offenses against electoral law). The degree of restriction varies widely between countries, both legally and politically.

Significance and Limits of Disenfranchisement

Constitutional Limitations

Disenfranchisement requires a clear legal basis and must be proportionate. The Federal Constitutional Court has repeatedly confirmed the narrow limits for loss of voting rights, especially concerning people with disabilities. The jurisprudence emphasizes the particularly high value that the right to vote holds in the democratic system.

Current Developments and Reforms

In light of international obligations (e.g., UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) and national court decisions, exclusions from voting rights, especially for people with disabilities, have been reviewed and partially lifted in recent years. For example, in 2019, a change to the Federal Election Act largely abolished the blanket disenfranchisement of fully supported individuals.

Legal Consequences of Disenfranchisement

Administrative Procedures

The exclusion is usually determined automatically based on official registers and court decisions. Affected individuals can file legal remedies against their entry as disenfranchised persons.

Restoration of Voting Rights

After the expiration of a suspension period or when the grounds for exclusion have ceased to exist (e.g., after completion of disenfranchisement), the right to vote is restored automatically or upon application. Details are determined by the respective electoral law.

Summary

Disenfranchisement is a serious restriction of a fundamental democratic right. In Germany and most democratic states, it is only permitted under narrow, clearly defined legal circumstances. The main focus is the protection of the functioning of the democratic order and protection against abuse of voting rights. Legal reforms and current developments demonstrate that constitutional protection of voting rights and the limitation of exclusions are continuously adapted to ensure the greatest possible societal participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can be excluded from voting rights?

In Germany, certain persons can be excluded from voting rights by statutory provisions. The relevant regulations are found especially in the Basic Law (Art. 38 para. 2 GG) as well as in the respective electoral laws, such as the Federal Election Act (§ 13 BWahlG), state election laws, and municipal election laws. Under § 13 BWahlG, persons who have been deprived of their voting rights by judicial order are excluded, for example, because they have forfeited the fundamental right to vote under Art. 18 GG or due to a specific criminal conviction. Excluded are also persons who are under complete guardianship as defined by the Civil Code (§ 1896, 1899 BGB) in all matters or who, by court order, are placed in a psychiatric hospital. Thus, disenfranchisement is explicitly and conclusively regulated by law and always requires a formal order.

On what grounds can a person be excluded from voting rights?

Disenfranchisement essentially occurs for reasons relating to the ability or integrity of the voter. The most common grounds include judicial decisions where the voting right is withdrawn as a judicial consequence, and certain guardianship cases in which comprehensive guardianship has been ordered for all matters. The legislature aims to protect the integrity and proper functioning of the democratic electoral process by excluding persons who, as a result of a serious criminal offense or chronic incapacity for independent decision-making, are unable to participate in elections. Withdrawal on mere administrative grounds, without judicial decision, is not permitted.

What legal remedies are available against disenfranchisement?

There are legal safeguards against disenfranchisement. Affected persons can appeal against a judicial decision that withdraws their voting rights, such as by filing an appeal or revision in accordance with the general codes of procedure (e.g., Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure). In the case of guardianship, a complaint can be filed with the competent local court against the guardianship order. Furthermore, an electoral complaint can be lodged with the Federal Constitutional Court if someone has been unjustly prevented from voting. These remedies serve to protect the fundamental right of participation and ensure effective judicial review in accordance with Art. 19 para. 4 GG.

Is disenfranchisement unlimited in duration, or can voting rights be regained?

Disenfranchisement is generally not unlimited and depends on the circumstances of the individual case. In the event of a judicial decision, such as disenfranchisement as a criminal consequence, it lasts as long as the conditions specified in the judgment are met or until a corresponding judicial reassessment is made. For comprehensive guardianship, the exclusion ends once the court-ordered guardianship is lifted or restricted. Thus, there are possibilities to regain voting rights, for example, through re-granting following successful rehabilitation or termination of the guardianship measure.

What impact does disenfranchisement have on other civil rights?

Disenfranchisement relates solely to active and passive election participation—that is, the right to vote and to be elected. Other civil rights—such as freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, or the right to petition—remain fundamentally unaffected. Disenfranchisement therefore does not constitute a general restriction of citizenship rights, but affects only the rights and duties directly connected to voting.

How is it ensured that disenfranchisement does not occur arbitrarily?

Disenfranchisement is clearly regulated by law in Germany and can only occur based on express statutory provisions and judicial decisions. This prevents administrative authorities or other non-judicial bodies from unilaterally determining disenfranchisement. In addition, there are comprehensive judicial control and correction mechanisms ensuring effective legal protection. The constitutional principle of equality of elections and universal suffrage requires that exclusions be strictly limited and arbitrary measures prevented.