Legal Lexicon

Wiki»Legal Lexikon»M&A»Director

Director

Term and General Definition of Director

The term Director in the legal context refers to a person who holds a managerial or executive position in an organization, particularly in corporations such as stock companies (AG) or limited companies (Ltd). Directors are primarily responsible for the management, administration, and representation of a company in accordance with legal and statutory requirements. Different legal systems, especially those in the Anglo-American and Continental European legal spheres, provide differing regulations regarding the appointment, duties, powers, and liability of Directors.

Legal Status and Appointment of the Director

Appointment Procedures and Formal Requirements

The appointment of a Director generally takes place by resolution of the competent corporate body, usually the shareholders’ meeting or, in the case of stock corporations, by the supervisory board or the Board of Directors. The legal foundations and formal requirements for appointing Directors vary depending on the type of company and national legal system. In many legal systems, registration of the Director with the commercial register is required.

Term of Office and Dismissal

The term of office of Directors is often limited or extendable by the company’s articles of association or by law. Dismissal — depending on the legal framework — may occur at any time or only for good cause. The regulations on dismissal serve to protect the company and the functional capacity of the corporate body.

Rights, Duties and Responsibilities of the Director

Management and Representation Powers

Directors manage the business of the company, make strategic and operational decisions, and represent the company both in and out of court. The specific scope of their representative authority is defined by the articles of association or statutes. In the Anglo-American legal system, the Board of Directors is designed as a body with collective decision-making authority.

Duties of Care and Loyalty

Directors are subject to extensive Duties of Care and Loyalty. They are obliged to act in the best interests of the company (duty to act in good faith), to safeguard the interests of the business, to avoid conflicts of interest, and to exercise the necessary care of a prudent business manager in their activities.

Prohibition of Self-Dealing and Conflicts of Interest

Directors may not conduct transactions at the expense of the company and must disclose any conflicts of interest. In particular, company law provides for special regulations on self-dealing and conflicts of interest.

Confidentiality Obligations

Directors are obligated to maintain confidentiality about the company’s confidential matters. This obligation continues even after the termination of their office, as long as the company has a legitimate interest in confidentiality.

Liability of the Director

Liability towards the Company

Directors are liable to the company for breaches of duty in the context of their corporate office. This liability particularly includes claims for damages resulting from breaches of duty due to negligence or intentional misconduct. In pursuit of liability, the Business Judgement Rule must be considered, which allows Directors certain discretion in business decisions, provided these are based on an adequate information basis.

Liability towards Third Parties

Under certain circumstances, Directors may also be liable to third parties, especially creditors. This is often the case in cases of delayed insolvency filing or culpable breaches of duty resulting in losses to third parties. In German law, corresponding regulations are found in the Stock Corporation Act (AktG) and the Limited Liability Companies Act (GmbHG), among others.

Criminal Responsibility

Directors may also be held personally criminally liable for criminal offenses, such as those involving tax evasion, breach of trust, insolvency offenses, or fraud. Criminal responsibility exists regardless of civil liability.

Special Regulations for Directors in International Legal Systems

Directors in English Company Law

In the United Kingdom, Directors as corporate organs are comprehensively regulated in the Companies Act 2006 . This includes specific provisions regarding appointment, registration requirements, duties and liability. English law distinguishes between Executive Directors (managing Directors) and Non-Executive Directors (non-managing Directors), each with different areas of responsibility.

Directors in German Company Law

Under German law, the function of the Director corresponds roughly to that of the management board (in stock corporations) or the managing directors (in limited liability companies). The relevant regulations can primarily be found in the Stock Corporation Act and the Limited Liability Companies Act.

Directors in Other Legal Systems

In other countries, such as the United States or France, there are comparable corporate bodies such as the Board of Directors, Management Board, or Conseil d’administration, whose legal structure varies according to culture and legal system.

Corporate Governance and Directors

Directors play a key role in the system of Corporate Governance . They are responsible for ensuring compliance requirements, overseeing management, and implementing the company’s strategy. In many legal systems, relevant codes and regulations have been established that set out principles of proper and responsible corporate management.

Literature and References

  • Companies Act 2006 (UK)
  • Stock Corporation Act (AktG), Limited Liability Companies Act (GmbHG) (Germany)
  • German Corporate Governance Code
  • OECD Principles of Corporate Governance

Note: This article provides a comprehensive overview of the term “Director” in the legal context and serves for general informational purposes. For further provisions, company-specific arrangements, or country-specific specialties, the relevant laws and regulations should be consulted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What statutory duties does a Director have towards the company?

A Director (managing director, management board member, or supervisory board member, depending on the company form and jurisdiction) is subject in the legal context to numerous duties regulated by various laws and codes. The central statutory duties include in particular the so-called duty of care and loyalty. Within the scope of the duty of care, the Director is required to exercise the care of a prudent and conscientious business manager in managing the company. Decisions must be made based on adequate information and careful consideration of all relevant circumstances to protect the company from harm. The duty of loyalty obliges the Director to always act in the best interests of the company and to subordinate personal conflicts of interest in favor of the company. There are also reporting and disclosure duties, such as disclosing conflicts of interest, as well as accounting and reporting obligations, depending on national and international law. These duties are enshrined in national laws such as the German Stock Corporation Act (AktG) or Limited Liability Companies Act, as well as in international legal systems, with supplementary regulations possibly in the articles of association, statutes, and internal company rules.

What civil liability risks exist for a Director?

Directors are subject to significant civil liability risks. They are personally liable to the company for damages resulting from culpable breaches of duty during the performance of their functions (e.g., § 93 AktG, § 43 GmbHG in Germany). Liability especially refers to damages resulting from breaches of the duty of care or statutory obligations, such as improper business decisions, mismanagement, or failure to implement necessary control measures. Personal liability can also arise for violations of tax or social security obligations. In addition, external liability to third parties may exist if particular circumstances are present (e.g., delayed insolvency filing). In many countries, there is the possibility of contractually limiting internal liability or taking out a Directors-and-Officers (D&O) insurance policy, though such insurance generally does not release the Director from their original liability.

What role does the Business Judgement Rule play in limiting the liability of Directors?

The Business Judgement Rule (BJR) serves to protect Directors from unreasonably strict liability for business decisions. It states that a Director is not liable if, when making a business decision, they do not pursue personal interests, but act solely in the company’s well-understood interest and make the decision based on an adequate information basis. The BJR is especially significant in German stock corporation law (§ 93 para. 1 sentence 2 AktG) as well as in Anglo-American jurisdictions (notably company law in the USA and United Kingdom). The rule makes clear that not every misjudgment may result in personal liability with hindsight, provided the conduct was objectively reasonable and careful. However, the BJR does not apply to breaches of duty or grossly negligent behavior.

Under what circumstances can a Director be held criminally liable?

Directors can be held criminally liable if they commit criminal offenses in the course of their work. Core offenses include breach of trust (§ 266 StGB in Germany), fraud, insolvency-related crimes, tax evasion, or violations of regulatory provisions (such as the Anti-Money Laundering Act, market abuse). The prerequisite for criminal liability is always culpable conduct, i.e., intent or negligence. In practice, relevance may arise in cases of delayed filing for insolvency, manipulation of financial statements, or disregarding capital maintenance rules. Failure to fulfill certain duties (Director’s guarantor position) can also be criminally relevant. In the case of criminal offenses, penalties may include fines or imprisonment and professional bans.

What disclosure and transparency obligations do Directors have under German law?

Directors are subject to extensive disclosure and transparency obligations arising from both special statutes and general corporate law principles. Under German law, these include, for example, the duty to report conflicts of interest, significant holdings, related party transactions, as well as information on corporate risks or impending insolvency promptly and fully to the supervisory body, other Directors, or the general meeting or shareholders (§ 111 AktG, § 49 GmbHG). Directors are also responsible for compliance with publication requirements in the Commercial Code (HGB) and, where relevant, the Securities Trading Act (WpHG), particularly in relation to the publication of annual accounts, ad hoc disclosures, and other capital market disclosure obligations. Violations of these obligations can not only lead to civil claims for damages but also to criminal and regulatory sanctions.

What duties of cooperation does a Director have in the event of company insolvency?

In the context of imminent or actual insolvency or over-indebtedness, Directors are subject to strict statutory cooperation duties. In Germany, these include in particular the obligation to file for insolvency in due time pursuant to § 15a InsO. Directors must file for insolvency without undue delay in cases of insolvency or over-indebtedness, but at the latest within three weeks. Failure to comply is deemed delayed insolvency filing and may result in both civil damage claims by creditors and criminal consequences for the Director. Furthermore, the Director is obliged to secure the estate, refrain from preferential payments to individual creditors, and to properly hand over all relevant information and documentation to the insolvency administrator.

To what extent is a Director subject to special legal obligations in the context of corporate group matters (e.g. instructions from the parent company)?

In corporate group law, Directors have special duties, as they must balance the interests of the subsidiary company and the instructions of the parent company. Especially in de facto or contractual groups, the Director is obliged, when implementing the instructions of the parent, to ensure that these do not violate mandatory company law, capital maintenance provisions, or creditor protection rules. A conflict of duties may arise, for example, if an instruction from the parent is detrimental to the subsidiary or its creditors. In such cases, the Director is required to refuse the instruction and, if necessary, inform the relevant bodies or the court. In German stock corporation law, this is regulated in detail in §§ 308 et seq. AktG. Violations may lead to personal liability of the Director.