Fiscal Court of Münster Defines Criteria for Permanent Impairment in Shares

News  >  Aktienrecht  >  Fiscal Court of Münster Defines Criteria for Permanent Impairment in Shares

Arbeitsrecht-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte
Steuerrecht-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte
Home-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte
Arbeitsrecht-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte

Fundamental ruling by the Münster Fiscal Court on the persistent impairment of shares in business assets

With its judgment of November 3, 2010 (Case No. 9 K 3466/09 KG), the Münster Fiscal Court comprehensively commented on the tax requirements under which a lasting impairment of shares in business assets is to be assumed. Against the background of their high relevance for corporations, institutional investors, and high net worth individuals, the ruling emphasizes the strict conditions for the tax recognition of such losses in value.

Initial situation and relevance for investors

The tax treatment of share price losses on shares held as business assets is of considerable importance. While temporary fluctuations in value do not usually justify a partial write-down, a recognized and persistent impairment can have tax consequences.

In the case in question, a limited partnership applied for the tax recognition of extraordinary impairments from holdings in listed companies. It argued that the decline in the market price of the shares it held constituted a lasting impairment, which justified a partial write-down.

Standard for lasting impairment according to the court

The Münster Fiscal Court has precisely defined the requirements for the existence of a lasting impairment of securities.

Key criteria for recognition

It is therefore decisive that the market price determined on the balance sheet date is not merely due to market volatility or cyclical factors, but rather reflects a depletion of the company’s substance. The court emphasizes that, in order to assume permanence, a so-called “argumentative analysis of the individual case” is required:

* A mere decline in the share price is not enough to assume a lasting reduction in fair market value within the meaning of Section 6 (1) No. 2 Sentence 2 EStG.

* The decisive factor is whether there are objectively identifiable circumstances indicating a longer-term deterioration in the company’s economic situation.

Period of impairment

The judges state that an impairment is ‘permanent’ if, even under an objective assessment, there is no expectation of a recovery in value in the foreseeable future. Short-term price fluctuations or negative sentiment in the capital markets do not provide a sufficient basis for a tax-related partial write-down.

Required substantiation

According to the Münster Fiscal Court, the taxpayer must fully meet their burden of presentation. This in particular includes:

* Submission of company analyses, annual reports, and relevant business evaluations.

* Explanation of extraordinary special circumstances affecting the company’s substance, such as insolvency, significant balance sheet losses, or ongoing restructuring problems.

Assessment by the court in the case at hand

In the specific judgment, the court concluded that the limited partnership did not meet these strict requirements. The mere reference to a lower share price as of the balance sheet date was not sufficient as evidence of a permanent impairment.

Significance for tax planning and accounting practice

The ruling underscores the necessity of careful documentation and analysis when claiming partial write-downs on listed shares held as business assets.

Implications for companies and investors

The principles developed by the Münster Fiscal Court lead to increased duties of review and documentation for taxpayers wishing to claim company-related share losses for tax purposes. The decision provides clarity regarding the distinction between temporary and permanent impairment and addresses uncertainties in tax treatment.

Further legal recourse and current developments

It should also be noted that the case law regarding partial write-downs on shares is constantly evolving. The issue of recognizing permanent losses in value remains relevant, especially in light of ever-changing markets and legislation. Taxpayers should closely monitor ongoing proceedings and future higher court case law.

Source: FG Münster, judgment of 03.11.2010, 9 K 3466/09 KG


For further information or if you have specific legal questions regarding the accounting treatment and tax evaluation of securities, the attorneys at MTR Legal, specialized in capital markets and tax law, are available nationwide.

Your first step towards legal clarity!

Book your consultation – choose your preferred appointment online or call us.
International Hotline
now available

book a callback now

or send us a message!