Menu

New lawsuits against payment providers for illegal online casinos

Initial Situation: New Procedures in the Context of Unauthorized Online Gambling Offers

Published on March 18, 2026

In connection with online gambling offers that are alleged to be impermissible under the respective legal framework in Germany, further lawsuits have been filed against payment service providers in courts. The subject of these procedures is the question of whether and to what extent payment processors can be held liable for payment flows to the corresponding platforms.

The following presentation is based on the reported facts according to the source: Juraforum, report “Further lawsuits filed against payment service providers in connection with illegal online casinos” (available at: https://www.juraforum.de/news/weitere-klagen-gegen-zahlungsdienstleister-im-zusammenhang-mit-illegalen-online-casinos-eingereicht_274746). As these are ongoing proceedings, the presumption of innocence applies; a final legal evaluation is reserved for the competent courts.

Subject of the Lawsuits: Recovery of Payments Made

Basis for the Assertion of the Claim

According to the reported content, the asserted claims are directed at the reimbursement of amounts of money that players allegedly paid to providers of online casino offerings. At the center of this is not only the relationship between players and platform operators but also the role of payment service providers through whose systems deposits and withdrawals are said to have been processed.

Payment Service Providers as Defendants

The procedures are therefore based on the allegation that payment service providers have enabled or processed transactions in connection with unauthorized gambling offers. Whether liability arises from this depends on the specific circumstances of the individual case and the respective grounds for the claim, and is subject to judicial clarification.

Classification of Online Gambling Offers

The reported lawsuits are in the context of the licensing requirement for certain gambling offers as applicable in Germany. In cases where operations are alleged to have been conducted without the necessary license, the proceedings examine what legal consequences arise for the validity of legal relationships and for the unwinding of payments.

Importance of Payment Processing

The focus is on the question of how payment flows are legally to be assessed when they are conducted through payment service providers: On one hand, it concerns the actual execution of payment transactions, and on the other, the legal attribution and possible auditing or diligence standards that may play a role in claim scenarios. The standards to be applied are contested and, as far as can be seen, are being reviewed judicially in several proceedings.

No Precedent from Individual Cases

According to the report, these are further lawsuit filings that continue an already established line of disputes. Decisions in individual cases, however, are regularly case-specific; there is no automatic transferability to other scenarios. Particularly decisive are the specific design of the payment transactions, the roles of the involved parties, and the alleged facts.

Current Status and Presumption of Innocence

As far as payment service providers are claimed against, it should be emphasized that judicial examination only occurs in the respective proceedings. Until a legally binding decision is made, the allegations against companies or responsible individuals must not be considered established. The presentation is based exclusively on the above-mentioned source.

Assessment for Those Affected: Need for Clarification at the Interface of Gambling and Payment Processing

The development shows that legal issues surrounding online gambling are not limited to the relationship between players and providers but can also affect the payment infrastructure. For companies, investors, and wealthy private individuals, this can lead to complex demarcation issues, especially where payment services, compliance requirements, and civil law unwinding questions intersect.

Those who have a need for clarification in this context can seek an individual assessment as part of a legal consultation in banking law with MTR Legal Lawyers.

More articles

BaFin erweitert Befugnisse des Sonderbeauftragten – Foto: Robert Śliwiński / Pexels

Capital Markets Law

BaFin Expands Powers of Special Representative

November 9, 2026

Auslandsspenden: BFH verschärft Nachweispflichten für Spender – Foto: kaboompics.com / Pexels

Tax Law

Foreign Donations: BFH Tightens Donors’ Documentation Requirements

November 9, 2026

Bundeskartellamt prüft Googles Kartendienste für Fahrzeuge – Foto: Skylar Kang / Pexels

Competition Law

Bundeskartellamt Reviews Google’s Mapping Services for Vehicles

November 9, 2026

Book a callback

Available now17:51

We will call you back at the desired time. Immediately confirmed. Choose your appointment on our contact page.

Choose appointment

Prefer to talk directly? +49 221 9999220