Menu

Loss carryforward limitation not considered in final liquidation taxation

Background of the decision on winding-up taxation and loss deduction limitation

Published on September 27, 2025

On October 17, 2018, the Düsseldorf Fiscal Court clarified important aspects of tax treatment in the context of final taxation during the liquidation of equity interests under case number 6 K 4541/5 K. The core issue of the decision was the extent to which existing loss deduction limitations under § 20 para. 6 sentence 5 of the German Income Tax Act (EStG) remain relevant in so-called final winding-up taxation. The judgment touches on key questions regarding the equal treatment of investors and the systematics of tax loss compensation.

The tax law context of loss compensation

Loss deduction limitations in capital assets

The tax offsetting of losses, especially in the area of capital income, is subject to specific legal restrictions. According to § 20 para. 6 sentence 5 of the Income Tax Act (EStG), losses from the sale of shares in corporations can generally only be offset against similar profits. This restriction is designed as a measure to secure tax revenue and to prevent loss compensation across different types of income.

Liquidation as a tax-relevant disposal event

From a tax perspective, the liquidation of a company constitutes an independent disposal event. In this process, a so-called liquidation or winding-up gain is usually determined, which results from the difference between the liquidation proceeds and the original acquisition cost for the remaining shareholder. In practice, particularly in cases of final asset loss, winding-up losses often occur. However, the tax recognition of these losses is frequently in tension with legal loss deduction limitations.

Key considerations of the Düsseldorf Fiscal Court

Content and justification of the decision

The Düsseldorf Fiscal Court had to decide whether, in the case of a final liquidation of a corporation, a loss limitation under § 20 para. 6 sentence 5 of the EStG still applies. The judges concluded that in cases of final asset destruction due to the dissolution of a corporation, this loss deduction limitation no longer applies. The background is the systematics of § 20 para. 6 EStG, which refers to ongoing disposal transactions, while the liquidation signifies a definitive and concluding loss event.

Systematic classification and consequences

With their decision, the judges emphasize a strict differentiation between standardized disposal transactions and the final liquidation of a corporation. According to the court, the purpose of the loss deduction restriction is not intended to disregard true and uncompensable substance losses at the end of the liquidation of corporations. Consequently, the loss for the majority of companies in liquidation is to be recorded and made available for tax consideration, notwithstanding the restriction.

It can be argued against this interpretation that this creates an exception to the otherwise restrictive rules on loss deduction limitation. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the proceedings are pending at the Federal Fiscal Court and, therefore, a final assessment is still outstanding.

Outlook for entrepreneurs and investors

Practical relevance for corporate liquidations

The decision of the Düsseldorf Fiscal Court has far-reaching consequences for shareholders of corporations. Especially where liquidations occur in ongoing business operations due to economic difficulties, losses that may have previously failed due to the loss deduction limitation can now be considered for tax purposes. This particularly affects entrepreneurial shareholders and institutional investors whose engagements are associated with substantial risk.

Tax uncertainties and ongoing case law

It is important to highlight that an appeal has been filed against the judgment and the Federal Fiscal Court (BFH) has not yet made a final decision. From the viewpoint of legal development and legal certainty, it should therefore be noted that the current legal situation still requires clarification by the highest court. Provisional tax assessments and possible correction options remain unaffected by this.

Source note and legal assessment

The above statements are based on the facts and assessments outlined in the decision of the Düsseldorf Fiscal Court (Ref.: 6 K 4541/5 K, judgment dated 17.10.2018). Since the proceedings are pending before the BFH, the presumption of innocence applies in reporting, or changes in the legal situation are possible.

The tax treatment of losses in connection with the liquidation of corporations is characterized by considerable complexity and is currently subject to evolving case law. Companies, investors, as well as wealthy individuals, affected by the issue of loss deduction limitation or final winding-up taxation, have the opportunity to contact the attorneys at MTR Legal with their specific inquiries.

More articles

BaFin erweitert Befugnisse des Sonderbeauftragten – Foto: Robert Śliwiński / Pexels

Capital Markets Law

BaFin Expands Powers of Special Representative

November 9, 2026

Auslandsspenden: BFH verschärft Nachweispflichten für Spender – Foto: kaboompics.com / Pexels

Tax Law

Foreign Donations: BFH Tightens Donors’ Documentation Requirements

November 9, 2026

Bundeskartellamt prüft Googles Kartendienste für Fahrzeuge – Foto: Skylar Kang / Pexels

Competition Law

Bundeskartellamt Reviews Google’s Mapping Services for Vehicles

November 9, 2026

Book a callback

Available now17:08

We will call you back at the desired time. Immediately confirmed. Choose your appointment on our contact page.

Choose appointment

Prefer to talk directly? +49 221 9999220