”
Federal Labor Court decision of 19 September 2024 (2 AZR 160/24)
\n\n
In its judgment of 19 September 2024, file no. 2 AZR 160/24, the Federal Labor Court (BAG) decided an employment-law dispute. The subject of the proceedings was the review of an employer-initiated termination of the employment relationship against the statutory requirements applicable to this and the requirements developed by case law. In this respect, the decision text published by the BAG is decisive as the source (available via the Federal Labor Court’s decisions database).
\n
Procedural history and legal framework
\n
Starting point of judicial review
\nIn dismissal protection proceedings, an employer’s dismissal is assessed as to whether the formal requirements have been complied with and the substantive justification requirements have been met. In doing so, the respective circumstances of the individual case, the specific ground for termination, and the rules on the burden of presentation and proof must be taken into account.
\n
Relevant review standards
\nThe BAG bases its assessment on the guiding principles recognized in dismissal law. This includes, in particular, examining whether the facts relied upon by the employer are capable of supporting the termination of the employment relationship and whether the required balancing of interests leads to the termination interests prevailing. Also to be considered are questions of the proper hearing and/or involvement of works-constitution bodies, insofar as this is relevant under the circumstances of the case.
\n
Key statements of decision 2 AZR 160/24
\n
Classification of the termination-related facts asserted by the employer
\nThe BAG addresses the legal assessment of the events on which the employer relied to justify the dismissal. What is decisive is whether the facts alleged and/or established, by their weight and their relevance under the employment contract, are capable of justifying a dismissal.
\n
Requirements for the factual basis and judicial assessment
\nThe decision illustrates that labor-court review is based on a sustainable factual foundation. In doing so, the BAG refers to the procedural requirements under which factual assertions must be substantiated and the judicial assessment must be based on the facts as established. Within this framework, the role of the lower instances in establishing the facts and evaluating the evidence also becomes apparent.
\n
Balancing of interests and proportionality
\nThe BAG places the dismissal in the context of the required balancing of the parties’ mutual interests. In particular, the seriousness of the allegation underlying the dismissal, the degree of fault (where relevant), the duration of the employment relationship, the course of the employment relationship, and possible effects for both sides must be taken into account. The decision elaborates that dismissal, as a ground for termination, can only be upheld if it appears proportionate in the specific case.
\n
Significance for employment-law practice
\n
Guidance for comparable case constellations
\nDecision 2 AZR 160/24 shows that the effectiveness of a dismissal is regularly not to be assessed in isolation on the basis of a single aspect, but on the basis of the interaction of the factual basis, legal classification, and balancing of interests. For future disputes, the decision provides indications as to which aspects typically take center stage when assessing a dismissal.
\n
Note on the source and on distinguishing it from suspicion-based portrayals
\nThis article reproduces the decision on the basis of the judgment text published by the Federal Labor Court. Insofar as facts may be disputed in judicial proceedings, it must always be borne in mind that only the court’s findings are decisive and that the presumption of innocence otherwise applies. No further assertion of facts or supplementary presentation is made here.
\n
Classification by MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte
\nMTR Legal Rechtsanwälte advises companies, investors, and high-net-worth private individuals in matters shaped by commercial law, which may also include employment-law issues with significant financial and organizational effects. Anyone seeking a well-founded classification in connection with dismissals or dismissal-related conflicts can find information on legal advice in employment law at MTR Legal.
“
