Garden center outdoors without production: Warehouses are dispensable

News  >  Immobilienrecht  >  Garden center outdoors without production: Warehouses are dispensable

Arbeitsrecht-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte
Steuerrecht-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte
Home-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte
Arbeitsrecht-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte

## Initial Situation: Garden Centers in Planning Law’s Outskirts

In planning law’s outskirts, there are specific restrictions for structural uses. This also applies to garden centers, which—depending on their design—are connected to structural facilities such as halls, storage spaces, or sales areas. The decisive factor is whether and to what extent a use is permissible under the exterior planning law provisions or whether it is considered non-privileged.

## Decision Lines on the Permissibility of Storage Halls

### Privileging Requires Land-based Production

Permissibility in the outskirts can especially be considered if the projects can be assigned to privileged use. In this context, it is crucial whether an actually practiced, land-based horticultural or agricultural production characterizes the operation. A merely claimed or only subordinate production is not sufficient. Lack of a viable production component can result in buildings primarily serving storage or commercial purposes not being classified as a favored component of a privileged operation.

### Distinction Between Production, Trade, and Storage

In garden centers, the question regularly arises whether the operation is primarily focused on own production or whether trade and storage predominate. The more the operational purpose is aligned with goods turnover, stocking, and distribution, the more likely it is classified as non-privileged. Consequently, the planning law permissibility of halls primarily serving as storage may cease if the necessary production basis is no longer available.

## Consequences for Existing Facilities in the Outskirts

### Existing Rights Only Under Strict Conditions

Even for already constructed facilities, the question may arise whether and to what extent a use is still covered. Existing rights typically only come into consideration under certain circumstances and are regularly tied to the approved use and its actual continuation. Changes in the operational basis—such as the discontinuation of relevant production—may impact the legal assessment of existing constructions.

### Prohibition of Use and Removal as Possible Consequences

If a structural facility in the outskirts is not approvable or its use no longer accords with approved guidelines, building regulatory measures may be considered. These can range, depending on the individual case and the authority’s assessment, from restricting usage to ordering the removal of facilities. The assessment depends, among other things, on whether the facility functionally belongs to a privileged operation or appears as an independent, non-favored use.

## Meaning of Actual Operational Structure and Traceability

### Documentability of Operational Character

For planning law classification, it is not only the external designation of an operation that is decisive, but its actual structure. The scope, permanence, and significance of production relative to storage and commercial activities can be particularly relevant. When authorities or courts conduct assessments, the objectively recognizable operational character is typically in the foreground.

### Outskirts Protection and Avoidance of ‘Fronting’ Scenarios

The protection of outskirts aims to prevent sprawl and non-functional development. In this context, a use might be critically assessed if it gives the impression of merely fronting a privileged activity to enable constructions for other purposes. In situations where storage halls predominantly serve non-operational or trade-centered functions, the required allocation to privileged use may be denied.

## Classification and Procedural Status

In the related context, if administrative or judicial proceedings are mentioned, it is essential that their course and outcome depend on the respective status. In ongoing proceedings, the presumption of innocence applies; a final assessment is only possible after conclusive legal clarification. This article is based on the original report from Juraforum (available at: https://www.juraforum.de/news/gartencenter-im-aussenbereich-lagerhallen-muessen-weg-wenn-produktion-fehlt_276539).

## Reference to Real Estate Law and Need for Further Clarification

Issues concerning the permissibility of construction in the outskirts, the continuation of approved uses, and the distinction between privileged and non-privileged operational components regularly touch upon real estate law and adjacent areas. If companies, investors, or wealthy private individuals have need for clarification in this regard, classification within a professional consultation by MTR Legal in the area of Legal Advice in Real Estate Law takes place.