Copyright risks when copying paintings under your own name

Arbeitsrecht-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte
Steuerrecht-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte
Home-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte
Arbeitsrecht-Anwalt-Rechtsanwalt-Kanzlei-MTR Legal Rechtsanwälte

Protection of Authorship in the Reproduction of Artwork

Artworks are subject to copyright protection, which safeguards both the creators and their intellectual achievements from unauthorized use. The District Court of Düsseldorf dealt with the relevance of copyright in the case 12 O 156/24 (judgment dated 15.08.2024; Source: urteile.news) regarding the faithful reproduction of a painting and its presentation as one’s own creation.

Copyright Protection and Reproduction Prohibition

Quality of Work and Scope of Protection

At the core of copyright is the individual creative contribution of the artist. According to § 2 subsection 1 no. 4 UrhG, a painting as a work of visual art is generally eligible for protection if it reaches the required level of creativity. The protection covers both the original and adapted versions and reproductions, provided they do not represent independent new works or the protection period has expired.

Reproduction by Personal Imitation

The recreation of an existing work – whether by exact or nearly identical copying – is not considered free use (§ 24 subsection 1 UrhG a.F.; according to the new legal situation see § 23 UrhG n.F.), if the uniqueness of the original is adopted and no independent imprint is present. The court clarified in the present case that transferring a foreign painting onto a new canvas merely by copying does not constitute an independent creation, but rather represents an unauthorized duplication of the work.

Name Attribution and Allocation of Authorship

 

Presentation under One’s Own Name

The public display or sale of a copied artwork under one’s own authorship is particularly legally relevant according to the court. The confusion with an independent creation is capable of violating not only the reproduction right but also specifically the right to name attribution and authorship recognition (§ 13 UrhG). The abusive appropriation of authorship can also lead to claims for removal, injunction, and damages according to § 97 UrhG.

Distinction from Permitted Adaptations

Adaptations and alterations are permissible only if the resulting work clearly expresses its own substantial features and can be characterized as an independent new creation. Otherwise, the protection of the original work continues. Without consent from the rights holder, an adaptation and publication as one’s own work is regularly not allowed, as long as the individuality of the original persists.

Legitimate Interests of the Rights Holders

Defense Against Plagiarism and Reputation Protection

The proceedings highlight that artists and their legal successors have effective enforcement instruments against so-called plagiarism. Violations of copyright not only affect the economic interests of the rights holder but also the immaterial personal rights to the work.

Judicial Enforcement of Copyright Claims

In the specific case, the District Court of Düsseldorf deemed the conditions of a copyright infringement to be met. The copying was limited to a faithful reproduction of the work, lacking individual creative elements. Relative to the presentation as one’s own creation, copyright protection remains effective beyond material exploitation protection.

Note: The adjudicated proceedings are fundamentally subject to the representation obligations of judicial decisions and are legally binding in the result. An alternative evaluation is reserved for higher instances, if appealed.

Implications for Art and Business Practice

The decision emphasizes the extensive protective effect of copyright in the field of visual art and clarifies that even supposedly neutral craft reproductions can trigger legal consequences. For companies, investors, and collectors trading or exhibiting artworks, this results in an increased risk of claims due to infringement of copyright or related protective rights.

In view of the complex nature and the ongoing adaptation of the legal situation, integrating legal expertise is recommended for legally secure evaluation of possible individual cases. Clients who wish to delve deeper into the challenges surrounding reproduction, adaptation, or exploitation of artworks can find in-depth information and personal support at Legal Advice in Copyright Law by MTR Legal Attorneys.