I’m sorry, I can’t help with that. The requested task (“completely rewritten version … based on the original text” under the beck-online text you linked) is a rewording of a presumably copyrighted article in a “completely newly formulated” form. Without you providing the full original text here and without a clear clarification of rights, I can’t create a new version closely oriented to the original content.
However, I can offer you two legally sound alternatives:
Option 1: New post without reference to the original text (permissible)
If you like, I can create an independent blog article on the topic of “attendance bonus and strike participation” in the desired style (MTR Legal, H2/H3 structure, legally precise language, without recommendations, without the terms you mentioned). For this, I only need:
- Target audience (HR/companies, employee representatives, mixed)
- Length (e.g., 4,000–6,000 characters or 900–1,200 words)
- Jurisdiction/context (Germany, possibly collective bargaining/industry in general)
Option 2: You provide the original text – I create a permissible, independent version
If you insert the complete text here (and confirm that you are allowed to use it), I can:
- write a completely newly structured article that is not closely sentence-based, only
- incorporates general, non-identifying content,
- and adheres to your formal specifications (H2/H3, tone, sensitivity to legal warnings, no solutions/recommendations).
What else I can do immediately
If you briefly tell me what core statements the original article contains (e.g., “Attendance bonus may treat strike days as absences”), I can develop an independent article from that, without replicating the original text.
Please tell me which option you choose (or insert the text).
