Legal Lexicon

Wiki»Legal Lexikon»Strafrecht»Falsely Attributing Parentage

Falsely Attributing Parentage

Definition and Explanation of Terms: Child Substitution

Child substitution is a concept from the area of family and criminal law. It refers to the act in which a person deliberately assigns a child to a man as his own, even though he is not the biological father of the child. The focus here is on the pretension of paternity with the aim of obtaining legal or economic advantages. In a broader sense, child substitution covers all situations in which the biological parentage of the child is intentionally concealed or misrepresented in order to establish a different legal assignment of parentage.


Legal Classification under German Law

Family Law Aspects

Central statutory bases concerning the parentage of a child are found in the German Civil Code (BGB).

Section 1592 BGB – Paternity

The legal father of a child under German law is:

  • Whoever is married to the child’s mother at the time of the birth,
  • Who has acknowledged paternity, or
  • Whose paternity has been established by a court.

Child substitution often refers to cases in which the mother deliberately and falsely attributes paternity to a man, for example, by acknowledgement or by entering his name in the birth certificate.

Relevance for the Child’s Welfare and the Parent-Child Relationship

Child substitution can have serious effects on the individual welfare of the child, the relationship of trust between the parents, and on legal obligations (maintenance, custody, inheritance law).

Challenging Paternity

The right to challenge paternity exists especially when there are indications of child substitution. Relevant are Sections 1600 et seq. BGB. The persons entitled to challenge include the legal father, the mother, and the child itself. The prerequisite for a successful challenge is the existence of an error in the acknowledgment of paternity or a deliberate deception regarding the biological parentage.

Deadlines and Procedure

The deadline for challenging is generally two years from the time one becomes aware of circumstances that speak against the paternity. The proceedings are conducted before the competent family court.


Criminal Law Aspects

Criminal Liability under Section 169 StGB

German criminal law defines child substitution as a criminal offense in Section 169 StGB (‘Alteration or Suppression of Personal Status’). This offense covers, among other things, the falsification of parentage relationships by deception in the context of civil status proceedings.Elements of the Offense under Section 169 StGB:

  • Acting with the intent to cause the legal parenthood of a person to appear incorrect or to be established.
  • Impeding personal status by providing false information.
  • Typical action: Deliberately providing false information about paternity, for example, to civil status authorities.

A prison sentence of up to two years or a fine may be imposed.

Other Criminally Relevant Offenses

In addition to Section 169 StGB, other offenses may be involved:

  • Forgery of documents (§ 267 StGB): For example, by submitting falsified paternity acknowledgements.
  • Fraud (§ 263 StGB): In cases of obtaining maintenance or social benefits through falsely assigned paternity.
  • False unsworn statement (§ 153 StGB): In the context of court proceedings to establish paternity.

Civil Law Consequences

Consequences Related to Maintenance Law

If a man is assigned a child by substitution and thus becomes the legal father, extensive maintenance obligations towards the child arise. After a successful challenge of paternity, the man who was wrongly obligated may, under certain circumstances, assert claims for reimbursement against the mother or the biological father.

Impacts on Custody Law

An unlawful assignment of paternity can result in the unauthorized allocation of custody rights. The goal is to establish an arrangement appropriate to the welfare of the child after the true circumstances have been discovered.


International Perspectives

Criminal and civil action against child substitution is not a phenomenon limited to German law. Comparable regulations also exist in other legal systems – for example, in Austria (§ 188 StGB ‘Establishment of a False Civil Status’) or in Switzerland (Art. 255 ZGB regarding the presumption of paternity and its challenge).


Prevention, Education, and DNA Tests

Technical methods such as DNA analysis procedures have significantly improved investigative possibilities. Court-ordered paternity tests are now a key tool in cases of suspicion. Preventive effects come from clear civil status regulations, regular education, and early involvement of authorities when there are suspicions.


Summary

Child substitution refers to the deliberate, incorrect assignment of paternity with far-reaching legal and personal consequences. German law provides a range of family, civil, and criminal law mechanisms to enable prevention, investigation, and sanction. The main focus is the protection of actual parentage and the child’s welfare, the fair balancing of the interests involved, and the preservation of public order in civil status law.

Frequently Asked Questions

What legal consequences can result from child substitution?

Child substitution, meaning the deliberate wrongful assignment of legal parenthood, is punished with severe penalties under German law. According to Section 169 StGB (‘Child Substitution’), anyone who knowingly assigns false parents to a child or induces such a false assignment is criminally liable. Sanctions range, depending on the severity of the case, from imprisonment of up to five years or a fine. In addition to criminal consequences, there are civil law consequences such as the challenge of paternity or the revocation of parental custody. Claims for maintenance or inheritance can also lapse or be retrospectively corrected after proven child substitution. Limitation periods for prosecution as well as for civil law claims are regulated distinctly and may be extended by new facts.

Who is entitled to challenge legal parenthood in the event of child substitution?

Under German law, the challenge to parenthood in connection with a substituted child can primarily be brought by the legal father, the mother, the child itself, and in certain cases, the youth welfare office. The deadlines for a paternity challenge vary and usually begin with knowledge of relevant circumstances. The legal basis for this is Section 1600 BGB, which sets out the requirements and procedures for challenging paternity. It should be noted that certain deadlines must be observed; for example, the challenge to paternity must generally be made within two years from awareness of the facts.

To what extent does child substitution affect maintenance claims?

If a person is wrongly deemed the legal parent due to child substitution, statutory maintenance obligations initially arise. However, if substitution is later established and parenthood successfully contested, the maintenance obligation ceases as of the final decision. For support payments that have already been made, there may be a right to reclaim, provided gross deception or fraud can be proven. The right of recourse is governed by Section 812 BGB (‘Claim for restitution on grounds of unjust enrichment’), and good documentation and timely clarification of the circumstances are particularly important.

How does judicial determination of child substitution occur and what evidence is admissible?

Judicial determination of child substitution typically occurs within the framework of a challenge procedure. Essential evidence includes genetic parentage expert reports (DNA tests), witness statements, and documents such as birth certificates or medical certificates. Courts attribute significant probative value to scientific expert reports in parentage proceedings. The party alleging substitution must provide substantial and plausible grounds for believing there has been a wrongful assignment. Without corresponding evidence, a claim is rarely successful.

What role do medical expert reports play in connection with child substitution?

Medical expert reports, and especially DNA analyses, are the decisive means for the unequivocal establishment of biological parentage. Such reports can be ordered upon application in court proceedings. The results must be court-proof, i.e. prepared by recognized experts. In addition, data protection requirements must be complied with. In cases where a medical report proves the alleged parent’s lack of biological relationship, this is usually decisive for a positive decision in favor of the challenger.

In what cases can child substitution gain legal significance even after many years?

Even years after birth, child substitution may still have considerable legal consequences, for example in connection with inheritance matters, maintenance claims, or the desire to know one’s biological origins. Statutory time limits for challenges generally begin upon gaining decisive knowledge, so a later suspicion can still result in proceedings. However, the personal development of the child and the legitimate interests of the affected family group play a part in the court’s process of weighing up interests.

What effects does child substitution have on custody and visitation rights?

After a case of child substitution is established, there may be changes to parental custody and visitation rights. If legal parenthood is revoked, the associated rights and obligations of the affected parent also cease—particularly regarding decisions about the child’s life and place of residence. Transfer of parental custody to the biological parents or the mother likewise takes place through a family court decision, with child welfare always remaining the main focus. Visitation rights can also be revoked or newly arranged, especially if there is already an emotional bond between the parent and the child.