”
Introduction to the question of the mandatory use of beA before August 2022
\n\n
In the field of electronic legal communications, for years there has been an obligation to use special electronic mailboxes (beA) for legal entities with an attorney-focused purpose. In its decision of 13 June 2024, the Federal Fiscal Court (BFH) addressed the previously unresolved question of whether this obligation already applied, even before August 2022, to law firms organized as a GmbH. The underlying dispute was heard under case number VII R 34/22.
\n
Background of the proceedings
\n
Subject matter of the dispute
\n\n
A law firm in the form of a GmbH filed an application to be permitted to submit a specific document to the Fiscal Court in paper form. The background was that the company assumed it was not yet obliged to use the special electronic lawyers’ mailbox for the relevant submission. The competent court initially rejected the submission on the grounds that the obligation to submit electronically already applied to the corporate form of a GmbH.
\n
Legal developments and the cutoff-date issue
\n\n
Over the past years, the binding nature of the requirement to use beA has been continuously expanded. With effect from August 2022, the legal situation was clarified to the effect that law firms as legal persons are also mandatorily included. Prior to that, it was disputed whether the obligation to use it could already be derived from the rules applicable up to that point.
\n
Key points of the BFH’s decision
\n
Assessment of the normative basis
\n\n
The Federal Fiscal Court examined the statutory provisions in depth, in particular with regard to the requirements of the Code of Civil Procedure and professional-law rules applicable since 2018. Interpreting the statutory provisions in force up to July 2022 led to the conclusion that, during that period, there was no express obligation for a law firm organized as a GmbH to use beA.
\n
Impact on the case at hand
\n\n
The BFH found that the legal situation applicable before August 2022 did not provide a sufficiently clear requirement for electronic submission for the company in the specific organizational form. Accordingly, in the dispute at hand it could not be faulted that the applicant had submitted documents in paper form. The court’s decision therefore had to be made in favor of the GmbH.
\n
Significance for practice
\n\n
With its decision, the BFH created legal certainty for comparable constellations from the period before August 2022. The clarification relates exclusively to past periods and does not nullify the general beA obligation subsequently introduced as of the cutoff date. In this respect, the legal situation after the relevant date was expressly amended and expanded.
\n
Note on the procedural status and sources
\n\n
The judgment is final (see BFH, VII R 34/22; available at https://urteile.news/BFH_VII-R-3422_Zur-Nutzungspflicht-des-beA-fuer-eine-Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft-mbH-vor-August-2022~N34064). It relates exclusively to the legal bases in place up to July 2022; later amendments remain expressly unaffected.
\n
Outlook
\n\n
The practical implications in connection with electronic legal communications, in particular regarding the obligations of entities organized in the form of a law firm, are regularly suitable for expert review in the context of litigation support. For questions regarding procedural requirements and their implementation, companies, investors, and high-net-worth private individuals can find further information and individual support in the area of litigation at MTR Legal under Litigation.
“
